Language

Fraud Prevention

What is fraud prevention?

Fraud prevention is the set of policies, controls, and procedures an organization uses to reduce the likelihood and impact of fraudulent activity. It may address fraud during onboarding, account access, payments, claims, account changes, and customer support.
Fraud detection identifies indicators of possible fraud. Prevention uses those findings with other controls to challenge or stop an attempt. Investigation, remediation, and reporting continue under the wider fraud-management program. The functions work together, but the terms are not synonyms.

How does fraud prevention work?

A typical fraud prevention program includes:
  • Fraud-risk assessment. The organization identifies how its products, accounts, payment functions, and support channels could be abused.
  • Control selection. Teams choose preventive and detective controls for each risk, such as identity verification, transaction rules, device analysis, access controls, or manual review.
  • Data collection and assessment. Systems evaluate identity, device, account, behavioral, and transaction data before or during an action.
  • Decision and response. Policy may approve the action, request more evidence, pause it for review, or block it. Confirmed cases may require account restrictions, recovery work, reporting, or law-enforcement contact.
  • Measurement and revision. Confirmed fraud, false alerts, customer complaints, and investigation findings help teams adjust rules, models, thresholds, and staff procedures.
Controls should match the product and attack method. A measure that reduces forged-document fraud will not necessarily stop account takeover or an authorized push-payment scam. Reporting by fraud type shows whether each control is addressing the risk it was selected for.

What types of fraud can identity checks help prevent?

Identity and document checks can reduce fraud based on false identity claims, including:
  • Use of forged, altered, or digitally reproduced identity documents
  • Impersonation with a stolen or borrowed genuine document
  • Some forms of synthetic identity fraud that combine real and fabricated data
  • Presentation attacks using printed photos, masks, or replayed media
  • Some account-recovery and account-takeover attempts in which the attacker cannot prove the account holder’s identity
These checks do not cover every fraud type. Transaction manipulation, social engineering, device compromise, collusion, merchant fraud, and misuse by an already verified customer require other controls.
Identity verification may also need to be repeated during recovery, a sensitive account change, or another high-risk event because a successful onboarding check does not guarantee all later activity is legitimate.

Who uses fraud prevention?

Banks, payment providers, fintech companies, cryptocurrency services, insurers, telecom companies, online marketplaces, gambling operators, travel companies, and public-sector services use fraud prevention controls. Any organization that opens accounts, grants access, extends credit, processes claims, or transfers value may face relevant fraud risks.
Legal and regulatory duties differ by jurisdiction and sector. Some rules require named controls, reporting, or customer-protection procedures without using “fraud prevention program” as a formal legal term. Organizations should base their controls on applicable requirements and a documented assessment of their own products and channels.

How does fraud prevention relate to AML?

Fraud prevention and anti-money laundering (AML) can use the same identity and transaction data, but their objectives are not identical. Fraud prevention aims to protect customers and organizations from deception and unauthorized gain. AML controls focus on preventing, detecting, and reporting money laundering, terrorist financing, and related financial crime under applicable law.
One case may concern both programs. For example, an account opened with a synthetic identity may be used for payment fraud and later for laundering proceeds. Governance should specify how fraud and AML teams share evidence, escalate cases, and meet separate reporting duties.

How can Regula help with fraud prevention?

Regula supports the identity-related part of fraud prevention during onboarding, reverification, account recovery, and other higher-risk checks.
Regula Document Reader SDK authenticates identity documents and extracts personal data from the visual inspection zone, machine-readable zone (MRZ), barcodes, and supported NFC/RFID chips. Its database contains more than 16,500 document templates from 254 countries and territories. Document liveness checks can help distinguish a physical document from a screen image or another digital reproduction.
Regula Face SDK performs a 1:1 comparison between a person’s current facial image and a trusted portrait. Active or passive liveness detection can help identify presentation attacks involving photos, masks, or replayed media.
These results can feed a wider fraud decision. They do not replace device intelligence, behavioral analysis, transaction monitoring, case management, or staff investigation.

FAQ

Who is responsible for fraud prevention in an organization?

Responsibility is usually shared by fraud operations, risk, security, compliance, product, customer support, and engineering teams. Senior management sets risk tolerance and accountability, while control owners monitor performance and investigate failures. Clear ownership is needed when one case affects fraud, AML, cybersecurity, and customer-protection duties at the same time.

What does fraud prevention software do?

Fraud prevention software collects and evaluates data that may indicate fraud, then applies rules or models to support a decision. Depending on its purpose, it may examine identity evidence, devices, account behavior, transactions, or known fraud patterns. No single product covers every fraud type, so organizations commonly connect several controls with case-management and reporting systems.

When should a business repeat identity checks?

Another identity check may be appropriate during account recovery, device replacement, changes to important account details, high-value transactions, or activity suggesting that someone else controls the account. The trigger and evidence required should reflect the risk of the action. Routine repeated collection of identity data may add cost and privacy risk without improving the decision.

How do businesses measure fraud prevention performance?

Useful measures include confirmed fraud losses, fraud detection rates, false-positive and false-negative rates, manual-review volume, review accuracy, customer abandonment, and time to investigate. Each metric should identify the fraud type and control being evaluated. A lower fraud loss figure is not meaningful on its own if transaction volume, customer mix, or review policy changed during the same period.

On our website, we use cookies to collect technical information. In particular, we process the IP address of your location to personalize the content of the site

Cookie Policy rules